Security safeguards
Failure by a Data Fiduciary to take reasonable security safeguards to prevent a personal data breach.
Non-compliance
DPDP penalties are steep - but the largest exposure sits where organisations are most exposed: failure of reasonable security safeguards.
Statutory penalties
The Data Protection Board may impose penalties scaled to the nature of the contravention. Indicative ceilings:
Failure by a Data Fiduciary to take reasonable security safeguards to prevent a personal data breach.
Failure to notify the Board or affected Data Principals of a personal data breach as required.
Non-compliance with obligations relating to processing of children’s personal data.
Other violations of the Act or Rules by a Data Fiduciary may attract penalties of up to ₹50 crore. Additional ceilings apply to certain Consent Manager and related failures. Exact amounts depend on Board determination and the facts of each case.
Beyond the fine
Board proceedings rarely stop at a number. Non-compliance cascades into product freezes, partner scrutiny, and leadership accountability.
Security lens
The statute’s highest penalty attaches to reasonable security safeguards. That is not a policy footnote - it is an engineering and operations mandate: encryption, access control, logging, vendor oversight, vulnerability management, and tested breach response.
Specialised vendors connect DPDP readiness to the same discipline that underpins continuous security validation and compliance programmes worldwide - so “reasonable” is demonstrable, not aspirational.
FAQ